Torture may be the answer for a growing terrorist problem essays

Torture may be the answer for a growing terrorist problem essays Mother always said to tell the truth and be good. If people took this to heart the country wouldnt be facing the crime and terrorist problem. When people are arrested, they will do whatever they can to get out of their accusations; they will get the best lawyers, try to put on a face of innocence, tamper with evidence, make up a false alibi, and frequently lie. Its true they have to swear oath and put their hand on the bible. Lying under oath my be a sin to some, but not to others. When their lives are at stake, people will do whatever they can to seem innocent. So how is a judge or a jury supposed to get the truth and only the truth out of a criminal? The concept seems so simple, but it is very complicated. I will argue that torture should be allowed in the United States because it would help to get valuable information out of suspects. Torture is definitely not one sided, nor is it that easy to decide if and when torture should be used in each individual situation. It is easier to be against torture than to be for it. Torture is cruel and barbaric, and criminals whether guilty or thought to be shouldnt have to go through torture. Michael Levin says that torturing a terrorist maybe unconstitutional, but it maybe needed in times of great need (356 Levin). If someone is proven guilty, then they will receive their proper punishment, but if they are tortured, they are receiving punishment before they were tried in a court. Torture goes against the classic American belief of liberty and freedom to all people, including the phrase innocent until proven guilty. Since this country stands for liberty and freedom to all people, American citizens shouldnt have to live in fear of criminals, but on the other hand, they should not have to worry that they would be tortured for every petty crime like shop lifting or speeding. Torture shouldnt be an every day happ...

Alternatives to Using Said When Quoting a Source

Alternatives to Using Said When Quoting a Source Alternatives to Using Said When Quoting a Source When discussing the arguments of other thinkers, as we often have to do when writing a paper, you might find yourself writing so and so says quite often. While this is good enough most of the time, you may also want to vary your word choice. Moreover, in academic writing, says or said might not fully communicate what you intend. It may therefore be better to use a more precise alternative. Alternatives to Said There are plenty of synonyms for said that can be used in academic writing. For instance, if we imagine quoting an author called Johnson, instead of Johnson says that, we could write: States (Johnson states that the results are consistent with past studies) Asserts (Johnson asserts that the technique is flawed) Argues (Johnson argues that the test should be revised) Claims (Johnson claims that the conclusion is valid) Believes (Johnson believes that modern science should be trusted) However, it should be noted that most of these words are more specific than said. As such, youll need to check that the word you pick fits the situation. Saying that Johnson argues such and such, for instance, only makes sense if you are quoting an argument. As such, it wouldnt make sense to say Johnson argues that his favorite ice-cream is vanilla, since this is an opinion, not an argument. Likewise, some terms have connotations that you need to understand before you use them. The word alleges, for instance, can be a synonym for says, but it implies that the claim is unproven, controversial or doubtful. It therefore has quite a specific use. Nor should you avoid using the word says in your work. Its simply a case of being aware of how often you use particular terms and trying to find a suitable alternative if you are using any single term (including said) too much.